Inadvertent Outcomes (Part Three)

Last week I asked whether it reflects our Biblical Christian thinking and practice to use an assessment reduction as a penalty for late assignment submission.

Let’s remind ourselves of our purposes:

  • That our students comprehend how Biblical Christian understanding affects the way that we operate as school communities.
  • That we want our students to make good progress in knowledge, understanding and wisdom.
  • Assessment is something we do with and for our students, not to them; its purpose is growth.
  • That we want our students to develop good character and responsibility.
  • That all these things find their meaning in Christ.

So back to our issue. If I use the policy of reducing an assessment rating because of late submission, what is it that I’ve actually measured?

Have I accurately measured competence? No.

Have I encouraged future punctuality and responsibility? Unlikely, especially if I am a teacher who averages scores across a time period.

I fear I may have raised a major subject without the opportunity to discuss the complexities and realities of this problem. But I’m urging us to think whether the ways that we handle this issue best reflect a Biblical Christian understanding.

Beware assumptions. Do we presume poor motivation, perhaps laziness? The more likely reason is poor executive function; an inability to manage time and responsibilities. Anxiety may be an issue. Resources may be an issue – time, space, technology… We need to help identify the problem and assist with overcoming that issue.

 

Blessings
Brian